The future of human-AI collaboration: a taxonomy of design knowledge for hybrid intelligence systems
read the original abstract
Recent technological advances, especially in the field of machine learning, provide astonishing progress on the road towards artificial general intelligence. However, tasks in current real-world business applications cannot yet be solved by machines alone. We, therefore, identify the need for developing socio-technological ensembles of humans and machines. Such systems possess the ability to accomplish complex goals by combining human and artificial intelligence to collectively achieve superior results and continuously improve by learning from each other. Thus, the need for structured design knowledge for those systems arises. Following a taxonomy development method, this article provides three main contributions: First, we present a structured overview of interdisciplinary research on the role of humans in the machine learning pipeline. Second, we envision hybrid intelligence systems and conceptualize the relevant dimensions for system design for the first time. Finally, we offer useful guidance for system developers during the implementation of such applications.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Human-AI Collaboration for Estimating Scientific Replicability
Hybrid human-AI prediction markets match or slightly outperform AI-only markets at forecasting scientific replication outcomes across six social science disciplines.
-
AI in the Workplace: The Impact of AI on Perceived Job Decency and Meaningfulness
Interviews with workers in three sectors show that AI is expected to improve working hours in IT and healthcare but reduce social image, while service workers expect status gains but no hour improvements.
-
The New Social Image: How AI Competency and AI Proactivity Influence Self- and Peer-Perceptions in the Workplace
Vignette study finds low AI competency or proactivity improves perceptions of ownership and meaningfulness, with effects often stronger in self-perception than peer-perception.
-
An Entropy-based Framework for Hybrid Coalitions in Game Theory. Part I: Human Arbitration
The paper introduces NeoGame Theory, a framework combining lexicographic coalition utility with Jensen-Shannon divergence thresholds to manage execution authority in human-AI coalitions, and develops the human arbitra...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.