REVIEW 3 cited by
IntFormer: Predicting pedestrian intention with the aid of the Transformer architecture
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Understanding pedestrian crossing behavior is an essential goal in intelligent vehicle development, leading to an improvement in their security and traffic flow. In this paper, we developed a method called IntFormer. It is based on transformer architecture and a novel convolutional video classification model called RubiksNet. Following the evaluation procedure in a recent benchmark, we show that our model reaches state-of-the-art results with good performance ($\approx 40$ seq. per second) and size ($8\times $smaller than the best performing model), making it suitable for real-time usage. We also explore each of the input features, finding that ego-vehicle speed is the most important variable, possibly due to the similarity in crossing cases in PIE dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Can Reasons Help Improve Pedestrian Intent Estimation? A Cross-Modal Approach
Reason-enriched annotations and a cross-modal vision-language model improve pedestrian crossing-intent prediction over prior methods.
-
Seeing Beyond Frames: Zero-Shot Pedestrian Intention Prediction with Raw Temporal Video and Multimodal Cues
Gemini 2.5 Pro, prompted with 16-frame video clips and ego-vehicle speed, predicts pedestrian crossing intent at 73% accuracy on JAAD-beh without finetuning.
-
Enhancing Customer Service Chatbots with Context-Aware NLU through Selective Attention and Multi-task Learning
MTL-CNLU-SAWC uses query text plus order-status context and two training labels to boost top-2 intent accuracy by 4.8% over a text-only baseline on Walmart customer care data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.