Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bridging the Gap Between Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification to Enhance Trustability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.11828 v1 pith:OYOHDD6L submitted 2021-05-25 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords researchcombinedexplainableotherquantificationtrustabilityuncertaintyadvances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

After the tremendous advances of deep learning and other AI methods, more attention is flowing into other properties of modern approaches, such as interpretability, fairness, etc. combined in frameworks like Responsible AI. Two research directions, namely Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification are becoming more and more important, but have been so far never combined and jointly explored. In this paper, I show how both research areas provide potential for combination, why more research should be done in this direction and how this would lead to an increase in trustability in AI systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Uncertainty Awareness and Trust in Explainable AI- On Trust Calibration using Local and Global Explanations

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    People who saw uncertainty visualizations trusted a more certain model more, but the study does not demonstrate that this explanation calibrates trust better than numeric accuracy.

Pith tools