REVIEW 1 cited by
Bridging the Gap Between Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification to Enhance Trustability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
After the tremendous advances of deep learning and other AI methods, more attention is flowing into other properties of modern approaches, such as interpretability, fairness, etc. combined in frameworks like Responsible AI. Two research directions, namely Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification are becoming more and more important, but have been so far never combined and jointly explored. In this paper, I show how both research areas provide potential for combination, why more research should be done in this direction and how this would lead to an increase in trustability in AI systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Uncertainty Awareness and Trust in Explainable AI- On Trust Calibration using Local and Global Explanations
People who saw uncertainty visualizations trusted a more certain model more, but the study does not demonstrate that this explanation calibrates trust better than numeric accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.