Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Drawing Multiple Augmentation Samples Per Image During Training Efficiently Decreases Test Error

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.13343 v2 pith:BJ267LGK submitted 2021-05-27 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords imageaugmentationdatasamplesdrawingmultipletesttraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In computer vision, it is standard practice to draw a single sample from the data augmentation procedure for each unique image in the mini-batch. However recent work has suggested drawing multiple samples can achieve higher test accuracies. In this work, we provide a detailed empirical evaluation of how the number of augmentation samples per unique image influences model performance on held out data when training deep ResNets. We demonstrate drawing multiple samples per image consistently enhances the test accuracy achieved for both small and large batch training. Crucially, this benefit arises even if different numbers of augmentations per image perform the same number of parameter updates and gradient evaluations (requiring the same total compute). Although prior work has found variance in the gradient estimate arising from subsampling the dataset has an implicit regularization benefit, our experiments suggest variance which arises from the data augmentation process harms generalization. We apply these insights to the highly performant NFNet-F5, achieving 86.8$\%$ top-1 w/o extra data on ImageNet.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Principled Framework for Multi-View Contrastive Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two multi-view contrastive losses, MV-InfoNCE and MV-DHEL, match InfoNCE's asymptotic optimum while improving accuracy and embedding rank with more views.

  2. Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Deep learning optimizers should be designed to induce desired solution properties, not just convergence speed; different optimizers demonstrably land in qualitatively different minima.

Pith tools