REVIEW 1 cited by
Alleviating the Knowledge-Language Inconsistency: A Study for Deep Commonsense Knowledge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Alleviating the Knowledge-Language Inconsistency: A Study for Deep Commonsense Knowledge
read the original abstract
Knowledge facts are typically represented by relational triples, while we observe that some commonsense facts are represented by the triples whose forms are inconsistent with the expression of language. This inconsistency puts forward a challenge for pre-trained language models to deal with these commonsense knowledge facts. In this paper, we term such knowledge as deep commonsense knowledge and conduct extensive exploratory experiments on it. We show that deep commonsense knowledge occupies a significant part of commonsense knowledge while conventional methods fail to capture it effectively. We further propose a novel method to mine the deep commonsense knowledge distributed in sentences, alleviating the reliance of conventional methods on the triple representation form of knowledge. Experiments demonstrate that the proposal significantly improves the performance in mining deep commonsense knowledge.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Maskability Index: Predicting Task-Objective Alignment in Pretrained Language Models
A five-example DepthRank gap between masked and prefix templates sorts ATOMIC2020 relations into groups that match which prompt style generates better tails.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.