Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human-Robot Interaction based on Subjective and Objective Measures

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.05854 v2 pith:GMOVY22B submitted 2021-06-10 cs.HC

Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors Influencing Perceived Safety in Human-Robot Interaction based on Subjective and Objective Measures

classification cs.HC
keywords safetyperceiveddatahuman-robotinteractionfactorsmeasuresobjective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Safety in human-robot interaction can be divided into physical safety and perceived safety, where the latter is still under-addressed in the literature. Investigating perceived safety in human-robot interaction requires a multidisciplinary perspective. Indeed, perceived safety is often considered as being associated with several common factors studied in other disciplines, i.e., comfort, predictability, sense of control, and trust. In this paper, we investigated the relationship between these factors and perceived safety in human-robot interaction using subjective and objective measures. We conducted a two-by-five mixed-subjects design experiment. The five within-subjects conditions correspond to (1) baseline, and the manipulations of robot behaviors to stimulate: (2) discomfort, (3) decreased perceived safety, (4) decreased sense of control and (5) distrust. Twenty-seven young adult participants took part in the experiments. Participants were asked to answer questionnaires that measure the manipulated factors after within-subjects conditions. Besides questionnaire data, we collected objective measures such as videos and physiological data. The questionnaire results show a correlation between comfort, sense of control, trust, and perceived safety. We also discuss the effect of individual human characteristics (such as personality and gender) that they could be predictors of perceived safety. We used the physiological signal data and facial affect from videos for estimating perceived safety where participants' subjective ratings were utilized as labels. The data from objective measures revealed that the prediction rate was higher from physiological signal data. This paper can play an important role in the goal of better understanding perceived safety in human-robot interaction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Initiation Safety: A Missing Dimension in Generalist-Robot Safety

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Robot safety should treat "may I start a social interaction at all" as a separate authorization layer, implemented with staged non-verbal probes and a gate before any first word or reach.

  2. Initiation Safety: A Missing Dimension in Generalist-Robot Safety

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    The paper introduces initiation authorization as a distinct robot-safety layer and implements PAS, a probe-authorize-speak protocol, on a humanoid robot with a proposed three-condition user study.