REVIEW 2 cited by
pysentimiento: A Python Toolkit for Opinion Mining and Social NLP tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
pysentimiento: A Python Toolkit for Opinion Mining and Social NLP tasks
read the original abstract
In recent years, the extraction of opinions and information from user-generated text has attracted a lot of interest, largely due to the unprecedented volume of content in Social Media. However, social researchers face some issues in adopting cutting-edge tools for these tasks, as they are usually behind commercial APIs, unavailable for other languages than English, or very complex to use for non-experts. To address these issues, we present pysentimiento, a comprehensive multilingual Python toolkit designed for opinion mining and other Social NLP tasks. This open-source library brings state-of-the-art models for Spanish, English, Italian, and Portuguese in an easy-to-use Python library, allowing researchers to leverage these techniques. We present a comprehensive assessment of performance for several pre-trained language models across a variety of tasks, languages, and datasets, including an evaluation of fairness in the results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Durability and Cross-Language Transfer Benchmark for a Validated Teaching-Feedback Classification Protocol
The teaching-feedback classification protocol remains durable across three representation generations and transfers to English sentiment, so model choice is a deployment decision.
-
psytechlab at CLPsych 2026: Utilising Natural Language Processing methods and Large Language Models for Social Media Text Analysis
A standard NLP/LLM pipeline for CLPsych 2026 self-state, change-detection, and timeline-summarization tasks reached top-tier consistency metrics on summaries and mid-level ranks elsewhere.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.