REVIEW 1 cited by
Evaluation of Saliency-based Explainability Method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Evaluation of Saliency-based Explainability Method
read the original abstract
A particular class of Explainable AI (XAI) methods provide saliency maps to highlight part of the image a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model looks at to classify the image as a way to explain its working. These methods provide an intuitive way for users to understand predictions made by CNNs. Other than quantitative computational tests, the vast majority of evidence to highlight that the methods are valuable is anecdotal. Given that humans would be the end-users of such methods, we devise three human subject experiments through which we gauge the effectiveness of these saliency-based explainability methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
One-Shot Clustering for Federated Learning Under Clustering-Agnostic Assumption
OCFL automatically picks the clustering round by detecting a rise in the p-norm of the pairwise cosine-distance matrix of client gradients, and with density-based clustering it recovers client cohorts earlier and more...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.