pith. sign in

arxiv: 2106.14865 · v3 · submitted 2021-06-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Absorbing phase transitions with memory in critical scaling

Kartik Chhajed , P. K. Mohanty This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 13:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords absorbing phase transitionsquasi-stationary statesinitial condition dependencecommunicating classescritical scalingbirth-death-diffusion modeluniversality hypothesis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-stationary states in absorbing phase transitions become initial-condition dependent when configuration space fractures into disconnected classes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In absorbing phase transitions, systems alternate between activity and quiescence and can reach an absorbing state of total inactivity. It has been assumed that the long-lived quasi-stationary behavior, conditioned on survival, is always unique and independent of how the system began. This paper shows the assumption fails for memoryless Markov dynamics once the configuration space splits into multiple macroscopic communicating classes that cannot reach one another. In a birth-death-diffusion model the quasi-stationary state stays unique when birth processes operate, yet turns non-unique and preparation-dependent when births are suppressed because inter-class escape-rate ratios vanish in the thermodynamic limit. The memory of initial conditions then alters the critical exponents, challenging the usual universality hypothesis for such transitions.

Core claim

The paper establishes that, in a minimal birth-death-diffusion model, the quasi-stationary state is unique when birth processes are present but becomes nonunique and initial-condition dependent when they are suppressed. This occurs because the configuration space fractures into multiple macroscopic communicating classes whose inter-class escape-rate ratios vanish in the thermodynamic limit. The system therefore retains a measurable memory of its preparation that directly affects the critical exponents near absorbing transitions, challenging the conventional universality hypothesis and indicating the possibility of history-dependent critical scaling in controlled lattice or colloidal systems.

What carries the argument

The fracturing of configuration space into multiple macroscopic communicating classes with vanishing inter-class escape-rate ratios in the thermodynamic limit.

If this is right

  • Quasi-stationary behavior in absorbing systems can depend on initial conditions when birth processes are absent.
  • Critical exponents at absorbing transitions can vary according to preparation history.
  • The conventional universality hypothesis does not hold for all absorbing phase transitions.
  • History-dependent critical scaling becomes possible in lattice or colloidal systems where particle number can be tuned.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar initial-condition memory could appear in other Markov processes whose state space splits into large disconnected classes, such as certain epidemic or chemical-reaction models.
  • Experiments could prepare the same absorbing system from different starting densities and measure whether the apparent critical exponents differ.
  • Universality classes previously assigned to absorbing transitions may need re-examination when the communicating-class structure is taken into account.

Load-bearing premise

The configuration space fractures into multiple macroscopic communicating classes with vanishing inter-class escape-rate ratios in the thermodynamic limit.

What would settle it

Numerical simulation of the birth-death-diffusion model on a finite lattice that shows the long-time conditional distribution of particle numbers changes with different initial conditions once birth rates are set to zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2106.14865 by Kartik Chhajed, P. K. Mohanty.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) we plot ρ(t) for b = 1.4, d = 0.6 obtained from Monte Carlo simulations of the model for L = 8, 16, 32 -2 -1 0 1 2 d 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 b 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 ρs = 0 0 < ρs < 1 ρs = 1 P Q R FIG. 2. (Color online) Three phases of BBD model: ρ = 0 (absorbing) 0 < ρ < 1 (active) and ρ = 1 (maximal density). The APT occurs at d = 0. On PQR line ¯ρs = 1−ρs exhibits an ordinary phase transition, continuous (discon… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) Schematic representation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A system with many closed CCs (square) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many driven systems alternate between bursts of activity and quiescence and can become trapped in an absorbing state, such as complete inactivity in reaction-diffusion processes or extinction in predator-prey dynamics. It is generally assumed that, conditioned on survival, their long-lived (quasi-stationary) behavior is unique and independent of the initial condition. We show this need not hold, even for memoryless Markov dynamics. When the configuration space fractures into multiple macroscopic communicating classes, where configurations can be reach from one another within a class but not across classes, the system retains a measurable memory of its preparation, which can directly affect the critical exponents near absorbing transitions. Using a minimal birth-death-diffusion model, we demonstrate that the quasi-stationary state is unique when birth processes are present, but becomes nonunique and initial-condition dependent when they are suppressed. This mechanism, arising from vanishing of inter-class escape-rate ratios in thermodynamic limit, challenges the conventional universality hypothesis and suggests possibility of history-dependent critical scaling in controlled lattice or colloidal systems with tunable particle-number.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that absorbing phase transitions need not have a unique quasi-stationary state independent of initial conditions. Using a minimal birth-death-diffusion model, it shows that the configuration space can fracture into multiple macroscopic communicating classes when birth processes are suppressed; the resulting vanishing of inter-class escape-rate ratios in the thermodynamic limit produces initial-condition-dependent quasi-stationary distributions and can alter critical exponents, thereby challenging the conventional universality hypothesis for such transitions.

Significance. If the central mechanism is rigorously established, the result would alter the standard picture of quasi-stationary behavior in absorbing-state models and open the possibility of history-dependent critical scaling in tunable lattice or colloidal systems. The use of a concrete, minimal model to illustrate the effect is a positive feature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The claim that inter-class escape-rate ratios vanish in the thermodynamic limit (abstract, paragraph on communicating classes and the birth-death-diffusion model) is load-bearing for the non-uniqueness result, yet the manuscript supplies only numerical demonstrations on finite lattices and no analytic upper bound or scaling argument that controls the ratio relative to intra-class relaxation times.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive comment. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the analytic support for the central claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that inter-class escape-rate ratios vanish in the thermodynamic limit (abstract, paragraph on communicating classes and the birth-death-diffusion model) is load-bearing for the non-uniqueness result, yet the manuscript supplies only numerical demonstrations on finite lattices and no analytic upper bound or scaling argument that controls the ratio relative to intra-class relaxation times.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit scaling argument or bound would make the thermodynamic-limit claim more rigorous. In the revised manuscript we will add a finite-size scaling analysis in the section on communicating classes that derives an upper bound on the inter-class escape-rate ratio relative to intra-class relaxation times, showing that the ratio vanishes as system size tends to infinity. The numerical data already presented will be re-analyzed in light of this scaling to confirm consistency. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation grounded in explicit model dynamics

full rationale

The manuscript defines a concrete birth-death-diffusion model on a lattice, partitions configuration space into communicating classes, and examines escape rates between them. The central claim—that inter-class escape-rate ratios vanish in the N→∞ limit when birth is suppressed, leading to initial-condition-dependent quasi-stationary states—is advanced via direct numerical measurement on finite systems rather than by fitting a parameter that is then relabeled a prediction, by self-citation of an unverified uniqueness theorem, or by any definitional equivalence between input and output. No equation or step reduces the reported non-uniqueness to a tautology or to a prior result whose only support is the present work. The argument therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard assumptions of Markovian dynamics and the possibility of macroscopic communicating classes in configuration space; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dynamics are Markovian (memoryless at the level of individual transitions)
    Invoked when stating that memory emerges structurally despite memoryless rules.
  • domain assumption Configuration space can fracture into macroscopic communicating classes with vanishing inter-class transitions in the thermodynamic limit
    This is the load-bearing premise for the memory effect and non-uniqueness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1298 out tokens · 22553 ms · 2026-05-24T13:29:38.143040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [2]

    For rates (4),BN >D N corresponds to bd> 1.In this regime we expect the steady state density to be ρs =

    An excellent match of all three curves justifies the separation of time scale and the decoupling of the non- conserved dynamics from the conserved one. For rates (4),BN >D N corresponds to bd> 1.In this regime we expect the steady state density to be ρs =

    work page

  2. [3]

    Thus based on these phenomenological arguments, ρs =    0 d< 0 d 0≤d< 1 & bd≤1 1 otherwise

    For bd < 1, 1 L(DN +BN) = (1 −ρ)B(ρ) + ρD(ρ), which has its minimum at ρ∗= d. Thus based on these phenomenological arguments, ρs =    0 d< 0 d 0≤d< 1 & bd≤1 1 otherwise . (5) This result, of course, can be shown rigorously (see Sup- plemental Material). With ρs in hand, we can proceed to obtain the phase diagram in b-d plane. But there is a problem. ...

    work page

  3. [4]

    Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North Holland (2007)

    N.G. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North Holland (2007). 5

    work page 2007

  4. [5]

    Gillespie, Markov Processes, Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    D.T. Gillespie, Markov Processes, Academic Press, San Diego (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [6]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Me- chanics, Academic Press (1982)

    work page 1982

  6. [7]

    Friedli and Y

    S. Friedli and Y. Velenik, Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Systems: A Concrete Mathematical Introduction , Cam- bridge University Press (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [8]

    D. A. Lavis, Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Models, Springer, Dordrecht (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [9]

    Vanderzande, Lattice Models of Polymers , Cambridge University Press (1998)

    C. Vanderzande, Lattice Models of Polymers , Cambridge University Press (1998)

    work page 1998

  9. [10]

    Manacorda, Lattice Models for Fluctuating Hydrody- namics in Granular and Active Matter , Springer Thesis, Rome (2018)

    A. Manacorda, Lattice Models for Fluctuating Hydrody- namics in Granular and Active Matter , Springer Thesis, Rome (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [11]

    Schadschneider, D

    A. Schadschneider, D. Chowdhury, and K. Nishinari, Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems , Oxford Else- vier (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [12]

    Abeln, M

    S. Abeln, M. Vendruscolo, C. M. Dobson,D. Frenke, PLoS ONE 9, e85185 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [13]

    Privman (Ed.), Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension , Cambridge University Press (1997)

    V. Privman (Ed.), Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in One Dimension , Cambridge University Press (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [14]

    Henkel, H

    M. Henkel, H. Hinrichsen, S. L¨ ubeck, Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions, Springer, Dordrecht (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [15]

    Marro and R

    J. Marro and R. Dickman, Nonequilibrium Phase Tran- sitions in Lattice Models , Cambridge University Press (1999)

    work page 1999

  15. [20]

    Dickman, M

    R. Dickman, M. A. Mu˜ noz, A. Vespinani, and S. Zap- peri,Braz. J. Phys. 30, 27(2000)

    work page 2000

  16. [21]

    M. Basu, U. Basu, S. Bondyopadhyay, P. K. Mohanty, H. Hinrichsen Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 015702 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [22]

    Grassberger, D

    P. Grassberger, D. Dhar, P. K. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042314 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [23]

    K. A. Takeuchi, M. uroda, H. Chat´ e, and M Sano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 234503 (2007)

    work page 2007

  19. [24]

    K. A. Takeuchi, M. Kuroda, H. Chat´ e, and M Sano, Phys. Rev. E80 051116 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [25]

    M. M. de Oliveira and R. Dickman, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016129 (2005)

    work page 2005

  21. [27]

    New universality of critical exponents

    Suzuki, M. New universality of critical exponents. Prog. Theor. Phys. 51, 1992–1993 (1974)

    work page 1992

  22. [28]

    Pearce and D Kim, J

    P.A. Pearce and D Kim, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 6471 (1987)

    work page 1987

  23. [29]

    Malakis, A

    A. Malakis, A. N. Berker, I. A. Hadjiagapiou, and N. G. Fytas, Phys. Rev. E 79, 011125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [30]

    J. D. Noh. and H. Park, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016122 (2004)

    work page 2004

  25. [31]

    N. Khan, P. Sarkar, A. Midya, P. Mandal, P. K. Mohanty, Sc. Reports 7, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [32]

    Absorbing phase transitions with memory in critical scaling

    J. Keizer, On the solutions and the steady states of a Master Equations, J. Stat. Phys. 6, 67-72 (1972). Supplemental material for “Nonunique Stationary States and Broken Universality in Birth Death Diffusion Processes” Kartik Chhajed 1 and P. K. Mohanty 2 1Department of Physical Sciences IISER Mohali Knowledge city Sector 81 SAS Nagar Manauli 140306 India...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1972

  27. [33]

    Kinzel, Percolation structures and processes, in Ann

    W. Kinzel, Percolation structures and processes, in Ann. Isr. Phys. Soc., edited by G. Deutscher, R. Zallen, and J. Adler, volume 5, Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1983

    work page 1983

  28. [34]

    Hyver, J

    C. Hyver, J. Theor. Biol. 36, 133 (1972)

    work page 1972

  29. [35]

    Hinrichsen, Adv.Phys

    H. Hinrichsen, Adv.Phys. 49, 815 (2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [36]

    T. E. Harris, Contact interactions on a lattice, Ann. Prob. 2, 969 (1974)

    work page 1974

  31. [37]

    Jensen, Critical behavior of the pair contact process, Phys

    I. Jensen, Critical behavior of the pair contact process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1465–1468 (1993)

    work page 1993

  32. [38]

    Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals

    R. Wong, Asymptotic Approximations of Integrals. Aca- demic Press Inc., Boston-New York (1989)

    work page 1989