REVIEW 1 cited by
Likelihood-Free Frequentist Inference: Bridging Classical Statistics and Machine Learning for Reliable Simulator-Based Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Likelihood-Free Frequentist Inference: Bridging Classical Statistics and Machine Learning for Reliable Simulator-Based Inference
read the original abstract
Many areas of science rely on simulators that implicitly encode intractable likelihood functions of complex systems. Classical statistical methods are poorly suited for these so-called likelihood-free inference (LFI) settings, especially outside asymptotic and low-dimensional regimes. At the same time, popular LFI methods - such as Approximate Bayesian Computation or more recent machine learning techniques - do not necessarily lead to valid scientific inference because they do not guarantee confidence sets with nominal coverage in general settings. In addition, LFI currently lacks practical diagnostic tools to check the actual coverage of computed confidence sets across the entire parameter space. In this work, we propose a modular inference framework that bridges classical statistics and modern machine learning to provide (i) a practical approach for constructing confidence sets with near finite-sample validity at any value of the unknown parameters, and (ii) interpretable diagnostics for estimating empirical coverage across the entire parameter space. We refer to this framework as likelihood-free frequentist inference (LF2I). Any method that defines a test statistic can leverage LF2I to create valid confidence sets and diagnostics without costly Monte Carlo or bootstrap samples at fixed parameter settings. We study two likelihood-based test statistics (ACORE and BFF) and demonstrate their performance on high-dimensional complex data. Code is available at https://github.com/lee-group-cmu/lf2i.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Amortized Inference for Sampling Distributions Where the Bootstrap Fails
A 'root network' trained on single simulated root draws with pinball loss gives near-nominal 95% confidence intervals for bounded maxima, infinite-variance means, Hill tail-index estimates, and 99% VaR—where the boots...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.