Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Efficient Insect Pest Classification Using Multiple Convolutional Neural Network Based Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.12189 v1 pith:UNJFOZHJ submitted 2021-07-26 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords pestinsectmodelsaccuracyclassificationconvolutionaldatasetip102
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Accurate insect pest recognition is significant to protect the crop or take the early treatment on the infected yield, and it helps reduce the loss for the agriculture economy. Design an automatic pest recognition system is necessary because manual recognition is slow, time-consuming, and expensive. The Image-based pest classifier using the traditional computer vision method is not efficient due to the complexity. Insect pest classification is a difficult task because of various kinds, scales, shapes, complex backgrounds in the field, and high appearance similarity among insect species. With the rapid development of deep learning technology, the CNN-based method is the best way to develop a fast and accurate insect pest classifier. We present different convolutional neural network-based models in this work, including attention, feature pyramid, and fine-grained models. We evaluate our methods on two public datasets: the large-scale insect pest dataset, the IP102 benchmark dataset, and a smaller dataset, namely D0 in terms of the macro-average precision (MPre), the macro-average recall (MRec), the macro-average F1- score (MF1), the accuracy (Acc), and the geometric mean (GM). The experimental results show that combining these convolutional neural network-based models can better perform than the state-of-the-art methods on these two datasets. For instance, the highest accuracy we obtained on IP102 and D0 is $74.13\%$ and $99.78\%$, respectively, bypassing the corresponding state-of-the-art accuracy: $67.1\%$ (IP102) and $98.8\%$ (D0). We also publish our codes for contributing to the current research related to the insect pest classification problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MSFNet-CPD: Multi-Scale Cross-Modal Fusion Network for Crop Pest Detection

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    MSFNet-CPD fuses super-resolved images with per-species text and beats YOLOv9 in mAP, but the text descriptions are class labels in disguise.

  2. Crop Pest Classification Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional

    A review of deep learning crop pest classification that proposes a taxonomy and trend summary, but whose screening counts and reference attributions are internally inconsistent.

Pith tools