Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Approaching the theoretical limit in quantum gate decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.06770 v4 pith:PLLIO2JK submitted 2021-09-14 quant-ph

Approaching the theoretical limit in quantum gate decomposition

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumgatescnotapproachcurrentdecomposedecompositiongate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

In this work we propose a novel numerical approach to decompose general quantum programs in terms of single- and two-qubit quantum gates with a $CNOT$ gate count very close to the current theoretical lower bounds. In particular, it turns out that $15$ and $63$ $CNOT$ gates are sufficient to decompose a general $3$- and $4$-qubit unitary, respectively, with high numerical accuracy. Our approach is based on a sequential optimization of parameters related to the single-qubit rotation gates involved in a pre-designed quantum circuit used for the decomposition. In addition, the algorithm can be adopted to sparse inter-qubit connectivity architectures provided by current mid-scale quantum computers, needing only a few additional $CNOT$ gates to be implemented in the resulting quantum circuits.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Practical Fidelity Limits of Toffoli Gates in Superconducting Quantum Processors

    quant-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0

    Benchmarking a decomposed Toffoli gate on IBM quantum hardware yields 56-64% state fidelities, but the claimed state-dependent error pattern is confounded by using different devices.