Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reynolds Stress Modeling Using Data Driven Machine Learning Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.07043 v1 pith:W5AMP5EH submitted 2021-11-13 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Reynolds Stress Modeling Using Data Driven Machine Learning Algorithms

classification physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords turbulencemodelslearningmachinemodelingalgorithmsdifferentflow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fluid turbulence is an important problem for physics and engineering. Turbulence modeling deals with the development of simplified models that can act as surrogates for representing the effects of turbulence on flow evolution. Such models correspond to a range of different fidelities, from simple eddy-viscosity-based closures to Reynolds Stress Models. Till now the focus of the data-driven turbulence modeling efforts has focused on Machine Learning augmented eddy-viscosity models. In this communication, we illustrate the manner in which the eddy-viscosity framework delimits the efficacy and performance of Machine learning algorithms. Based on this foundation we carry out the first application of Machine learning algorithms for developing improved Reynolds Stress Modeling-based closures for turbulence. Different machine learning approaches are assessed for modeling the pressure strain correlation in turbulence, a longstanding problem of singular importance. We evaluate the performance of these algorithms in the learning dataset, as well as their ability to generalize to different flow cases where the inherent physical processes may vary. This explores the assertion that ML-based data-driven turbulence models can overcome the modeling limitations associated with the traditional turbulence models and ML models trained with large amounts of data with different classes of flows can predict flow field with reasonable accuracy for unknown flows with similar flow physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Developing Machine Learning Models of Subgrid Turbulent Transport for Quiet Sun 3D Radiative Hydrodynamic Simulations

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    A tuned 3DCNN recovers Reynolds stress tensor components from filtered quiet-Sun velocity and density fields with ~31% lower RMSE on diagonals and ~8% on off-diagonals versus physics baselines.

  2. Cluster-Weighted Training of Deep Surrogate Models for Subgrid Turbulent Transport

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    K-Means cluster-weighted training cuts average MSE 34% and lifts R² from 0.54 to 0.80 for a 3D CNN predicting Reynolds stresses on StellarBox quiet-Sun data.