Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Image Segmentation to Identify Safe Landing Zones for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.14557 v1 pith:CZK6ARMF submitted 2021-11-29 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords deliverylandingsafezonesidentifydronefinalimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

There is a marked increase in delivery services in urban areas, and with Jeff Bezos claiming that 86% of the orders that Amazon ships weigh less than 5 lbs, the time is ripe for investigation into economical methods of automating the final stage of the delivery process. With the advent of semi-autonomous drone delivery services, such as Irish startup `Manna', and Malta's `Skymax', the final step of the delivery journey remains the most difficult to automate. This paper investigates the use of simple images captured by a single RGB camera on a UAV to distinguish between safe and unsafe landing zones. We investigate semantic image segmentation frameworks as a way to identify safe landing zones and demonstrate the accuracy of lightweight models that minimise the number of sensors needed. By working with images rather than video we reduce the amount of energy needed to identify safe landing zones for a drone, without the need for human intervention.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Experimental Study of Trojan Vulnerabilities in UAV Autonomous Landing

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A VGG16 landing-pad classifier trained with 30% 5x5-chessboard-triggered images drops from 96.4% to 73.3% accuracy on triggered input.

Pith tools