REVIEW 1 cited by
Machine Learning for Multi-Output Regression: When should a holistic multivariate approach be preferred over separate univariate ones?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Machine Learning for Multi-Output Regression: When should a holistic multivariate approach be preferred over separate univariate ones?
read the original abstract
Tree-based ensembles such as the Random Forest are modern classics among statistical learning methods. In particular, they are used for predicting univariate responses. In case of multiple outputs the question arises whether we separately fit univariate models or directly follow a multivariate approach. For the latter, several possibilities exist that are, e.g. based on modified splitting or stopping rules for multi-output regression. In this work we compare these methods in extensive simulations to help in answering the primary question when to use multivariate ensemble techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Parallel gradient boosting for flexible estimation of conditional distributions
A modified gradient-boosting algorithm trains one univariate weak learner per iteration for all output targets, giving similar accuracy to XGBoost for multiple quantile regression while cutting runtime by up to roughly 50x.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.