REVIEW 1 cited by
Speed, Quality, and the Optimal Timing of Complex Decisions: Field Evidence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Speed, Quality, and the Optimal Timing of Complex Decisions: Field Evidence
read the original abstract
This paper presents an empirical investigation of the relation between decision speed and decision quality for a real-world setting of cognitively-demanding decisions in which the timing of decisions is endogenous: professional chess. Move-by-move data provide exceptionally detailed and precise information about decision times and decision quality, based on a comparison of actual decisions to a computational benchmark of best moves constructed using the artificial intelligence of a chess engine. The results reveal that faster decisions are associated with better performance. The findings are consistent with the predictions of procedural decision models like drift-diffusion-models in which decision makers sequentially acquire information about decision alternatives with uncertain valuations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving
DeliChess is a new dataset of group deliberation dialogues on chess puzzles showing that discussion improves collective accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.