REVIEW 2 cited by
Code Smells in Machine Learning Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As Deep learning (DL) systems continuously evolve and grow, assuring their quality becomes an important yet challenging task. Compared to non-DL systems, DL systems have more complex team compositions and heavier data dependency. These inherent characteristics would potentially cause DL systems to be more vulnerable to bugs and, in the long run, to maintenance issues. Code smells are empirically tested as efficient indicators of non-DL systems. Therefore, we took a step forward into identifying code smells, and understanding their impact on maintenance in this comprehensive study. This is the first study on investigating code smells in the context of DL software systems, which helps researchers and practitioners to get a first look at what kind of maintenance modification made and what code smells developers have been dealing with. Our paper has three major contributions. First, we comprehensively investigated the maintenance modifications that have been made by DL developers via studying the evolution of DL systems, and we identified nine frequently occurred maintenance-related modification categories in DL systems. Second, we summarized five code smells in DL systems. Third, we validated the prevalence, and the impact of our newly identified code smells through a mixture of qualitative and quantitative analysis. We found that our newly identified code smells are prevalent and impactful on the maintenance of DL systems from the developer's perspective.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Automated Detection of Inter-Language Design Smells in Multi-Language Deep Learning Frameworks
This paper defines seven inter-language design smells for Python/C++ deep learning frameworks and reports a detector (CPSMELL) with 98.17% precision on five frameworks.
-
What Do Machine Learning Researchers Mean by "Reproducible"?
A survey-based taxonomy that splits reproducibility in AI/ML into eight rigor aspects (repeatability, reproducibility, replicability, adaptability, model selection, label/data quality, meta/incentive, maintainability)...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.