REVIEW 3 cited by
Empirical limb-darkening coefficients & transit parameters of known exoplanets from TESS
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Empirical limb-darkening coefficients & transit parameters of known exoplanets from TESS
read the original abstract
Although the main goal of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (\textit{TESS}) is to search for new transiting exoplanets, its data can also be used to study in further detail already known systems. The \textit{TESS} bandpass is particularly interesting to study the limb-darkening effect of the stellar host which is imprinted in transit lightcurves, as the widely used \textsc{phoenix} and \textsc{atlas} stellar models predict different limb-darkening profiles. Here we study this effect by fitting the transit lightcurves of 176 known exoplanetary systems observed by \textit{TESS}, which allows us to extract empirical limb-darkening coefficients (LDCs) for the widely used quadratic law, but also updated transit parameters (including ephemerides refinements) as a byproduct. Comparing our empirically obtained LDCs with theoretical predictions, we find significant offsets when using tabulated \textit{TESS} LDCs. Specifically, the $u_2$ coefficients obtained using \textsc{phoenix} models show the largest discrepancies depending on the method used to derive them, with offsets that can reach up to $\Delta u_2 \approx 0.2$ on average. Most of those average offsets disappear, however, if one uses the SPAM algorithm introduced by Howarth (2011) to calculate the LDCs instead. Our results suggest, however, that for stars cooler than about 5000 K, no methodology is good enough to explain the limb-darkening effect: we observe a sharp deviation between measured and predicted LDCs on both quadratic LDCs of order $\Delta u_1, \Delta u_2 \approx 0.2$ for those cool stars. We recommend caution when assuming limb-darkening coefficients as perfectly known thus, in particular for these cooler stars when analyzing \textit{TESS} transit lightcurves.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Mitigating Charge Migration in JWST NIRISS Reveals That KELT-7 b is a Metal-enriched Ultra-hot Jupiter Orbiting a Young Metal-rich Star
Correcting NIRISS charge migration reveals KELT-7 b as a metal-enriched (~92x solar) ultra-hot Jupiter with H2O, CO2 and TiO but no H- or clouds, orbiting a young metal-rich star.
-
Evidence for elemental diffusion in the eclipsing binary star AI Phoenicis
In the eclipsing binary AI Phe, the hotter component is depleted in Fe and Mg relative to its cooler subgiant companion by about 0.1 dex, matching the atomic-diffusion signature seen in the open cluster M67.
-
Companion Architectures of Sub-Saturns: Distinct Migration Pathways Across the Neptunian Landscape
Desert/ridge sub-Saturns show ~10% nearby-companion rates like hot Jupiters; savanna ones show ~70% like warm Jupiters, supporting HEM versus quiescent migration.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.