Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is it all a cluster game? -- Exploring Out-of-Distribution Detection based on Clustering in the Embedding Space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.08549 v1 pith:LJIZLZEF submitted 2022-03-16 cs.CV

Is it all a cluster game? -- Exploring Out-of-Distribution Detection based on Clustering in the Embedding Space

classification cs.CV
keywords trainingclusterscontrastiveout-of-distributiondatamethodsclusteringcross-entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is essential for safety-critical applications of deep neural networks to determine when new inputs are significantly different from the training distribution. In this paper, we explore this out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem for image classification using clusters of semantically similar embeddings of the training data and exploit the differences in distance relationships to these clusters between in- and out-of-distribution data. We study the structure and separation of clusters in the embedding space and find that supervised contrastive learning leads to well-separated clusters while its self-supervised counterpart fails to do so. In our extensive analysis of different training methods, clustering strategies, distance metrics, and thresholding approaches, we observe that there is no clear winner. The optimal approach depends on the model architecture and selected datasets for in- and out-of-distribution. While we could reproduce the outstanding results for contrastive training on CIFAR-10 as in-distribution data, we find standard cross-entropy paired with cosine similarity outperforms all contrastive training methods when training on CIFAR-100 instead. Cross-entropy provides competitive results as compared to expensive contrastive training methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Face-trace: Open-Set Attribution and Progressive Discovery of Synthetic Face Generators

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A pipeline combining frozen I-JEPA embeddings, energy-based OOD rejection, and HDBSCAN clustering achieves 87.74% purity in discovering unknown synthetic face generators, extended to an incremental setting with 99.23%...