REVIEW 2 cited by
WOODS: Benchmarks for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Time Series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
WOODS: Benchmarks for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Time Series
read the original abstract
Machine learning models often fail to generalize well under distributional shifts. Understanding and overcoming these failures have led to a research field of Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization. Despite being extensively studied for static computer vision tasks, OOD generalization has been underexplored for time series tasks. To shine light on this gap, we present WOODS: eight challenging open-source time series benchmarks covering a diverse range of data modalities, such as videos, brain recordings, and sensor signals. We revise the existing OOD generalization algorithms for time series tasks and evaluate them using our systematic framework. Our experiments show a large room for improvement for empirical risk minimization and OOD generalization algorithms on our datasets, thus underscoring the new challenges posed by time series tasks. Code and documentation are available at https://woods-benchmarks.github.io .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Microlensing Detection and Inference via Learned Bayes Factors
A unified transformer-based pipeline detects 99.9% of recoverable simulated microlensing events and outperforms literature hard cuts in the short-duration finite-source regime with amortized neural posterior inference.
-
OPD-Evolver: Cultivating Holistic Agent Evolver via On-Policy Distillation
OPD-Evolver uses on-policy self-distillation in fast interaction and slow attribution loops to build agents with holistic memory competence, outperforming prior systems by up to 11.5% and allowing a 9B model to compet...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.