Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.10185 v1 pith:TD7Z7VQA submitted 2022-03-18 cs.LG

Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Features

classification cs.LG
keywords meta-sgdfeaturesadaptationmodeltasklearning-ratemamlnegative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Model Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) consists of two optimization loops: the outer loop learns a meta-initialization of model parameters that is shared across tasks, and the inner loop task-specific adaptation step. A variant of MAML, Meta-SGD, uses the same two loop structure, but also learns the learning-rate for the adaptation step. Little attention has been paid to how the learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD affects feature reuse. In this paper, we study the effect that a learned learning-rate has on the per-task feature representations in Meta-SGD. The learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD often contains negative values. During the adaptation phase, these negative learning rates push features away from task-specific features and towards task-agnostic features. We performed several experiments on the Mini-Imagenet dataset. Two neural networks were trained, one with MAML, and one with Meta-SGD. The feature quality for both models was tested as follows: strip away the linear classification layer, pass labeled and unlabeled samples through this encoder, classify the unlabeled samples according to their nearest neighbor. This process was performed: 1) after training and using the meta-initialization parameters; 2) after adaptation, and validated on that task; and 3) after adaptation, and validated on a different task. The MAML trained model improved on the task it was adapted to, but had worse performance on other tasks. The Meta-SGD trained model was the opposite; it had worse performance on the task it was adapted to, but improved on other tasks. This confirms the hypothesis that Meta-SGD's negative learning rates cause the model to learn task-agnostic features rather than simply adapt to task specific features.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CCoMAML: Efficient Cattle Identification Using Cooperative Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    CCoMAML, a Cooperative MAML variant with a CNN co-learner, reports strong few-shot cattle identification from muzzle images, but its test-set-tuned hyperparameters and best-split reporting weaken the result.