REVIEW 1 cited by
Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Features
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Negative Inner-Loop Learning Rates Learn Universal Features
read the original abstract
Model Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) consists of two optimization loops: the outer loop learns a meta-initialization of model parameters that is shared across tasks, and the inner loop task-specific adaptation step. A variant of MAML, Meta-SGD, uses the same two loop structure, but also learns the learning-rate for the adaptation step. Little attention has been paid to how the learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD affects feature reuse. In this paper, we study the effect that a learned learning-rate has on the per-task feature representations in Meta-SGD. The learned learning-rate of Meta-SGD often contains negative values. During the adaptation phase, these negative learning rates push features away from task-specific features and towards task-agnostic features. We performed several experiments on the Mini-Imagenet dataset. Two neural networks were trained, one with MAML, and one with Meta-SGD. The feature quality for both models was tested as follows: strip away the linear classification layer, pass labeled and unlabeled samples through this encoder, classify the unlabeled samples according to their nearest neighbor. This process was performed: 1) after training and using the meta-initialization parameters; 2) after adaptation, and validated on that task; and 3) after adaptation, and validated on a different task. The MAML trained model improved on the task it was adapted to, but had worse performance on other tasks. The Meta-SGD trained model was the opposite; it had worse performance on the task it was adapted to, but improved on other tasks. This confirms the hypothesis that Meta-SGD's negative learning rates cause the model to learn task-agnostic features rather than simply adapt to task specific features.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CCoMAML: Efficient Cattle Identification Using Cooperative Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
CCoMAML, a Cooperative MAML variant with a CNN co-learner, reports strong few-shot cattle identification from muzzle images, but its test-set-tuned hyperparameters and best-split reporting weaken the result.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.