Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TDR-CL: Targeted Doubly Robust Collaborative Learning for Debiased Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.10258 v3 pith:H2PBIZ5R submitted 2022-03-19 cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML

TDR-CL: Targeted Doubly Robust Collaborative Learning for Debiased Recommendations

classification cs.IR cs.LGstat.ML
keywords biaserrorsimputedlearningaccurateanalysisapproachcollaborative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bias is a common problem inherent in recommender systems, which is entangled with users' preferences and poses a great challenge to unbiased learning. For debiasing tasks, the doubly robust (DR) method and its variants show superior performance due to the double robustness property, that is, DR is unbiased when either imputed errors or learned propensities are accurate. However, our theoretical analysis reveals that DR usually has a large variance. Meanwhile, DR would suffer unexpectedly large bias and poor generalization caused by inaccurate imputed errors and learned propensities, which usually occur in practice. In this paper, we propose a principled approach that can effectively reduce bias and variance simultaneously for existing DR approaches when the error imputation model is misspecified. In addition, we further propose a novel semi-parametric collaborative learning approach that decomposes imputed errors into parametric and nonparametric parts and updates them collaboratively, resulting in more accurate predictions. Both theoretical analysis and experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed methods compared with existing debiasing methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ConAlign: Conditional Alignment Framework for Balancing Biased and Unbiased Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A per-instance gated alignment between biased and unbiased ranking towers improved unbiased recommendation accuracy and, in live deployment at Kuaishou, slightly raised retention and interest diversity with negligible...