REVIEW 1 cited by
Physically Interpretable Machine Learning for nuclear masses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Physically Interpretable Machine Learning for nuclear masses
read the original abstract
We present a novel approach to modeling the ground state mass of atomic nuclei based directly on a probabilistic neural network constrained by relevant physics. Our Physically Interpretable Machine Learning (PIML) approach incorporates knowledge of physics by using a physically motivated feature space in addition to a soft physics constraint that is implemented as a penalty to the loss function. We train our PIML model on a random set of $\sim$20\% of the Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME) and predict the remaining $\sim$80\%. The success of our methodology is exhibited by the unprecedented $\sigma_\textrm{RMS}\sim186$ keV match to data for the training set and $\sigma_\textrm{RMS}\sim316$ keV for the entire AME with $Z \geq 20$. We show that our general methodology can be interpreted using feature importance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Machine learning the impact parameter in heavy-ion collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 4 and 11 GeV: a cross-check study with UrQMD, AMPT, and JAM
A LightGBM model trained on pion observables from one transport model predicts impact parameters in Au+Au collisions at 4 and 11 GeV with 0.2-0.4 fm error, generalizing to data from other models where polynomial fits fail.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.