REVIEW 1 cited by
Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch Robustness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Give Me Your Attention: Dot-Product Attention Considered Harmful for Adversarial Patch Robustness
read the original abstract
Neural architectures based on attention such as vision transformers are revolutionizing image recognition. Their main benefit is that attention allows reasoning about all parts of a scene jointly. In this paper, we show how the global reasoning of (scaled) dot-product attention can be the source of a major vulnerability when confronted with adversarial patch attacks. We provide a theoretical understanding of this vulnerability and relate it to an adversary's ability to misdirect the attention of all queries to a single key token under the control of the adversarial patch. We propose novel adversarial objectives for crafting adversarial patches which target this vulnerability explicitly. We show the effectiveness of the proposed patch attacks on popular image classification (ViTs and DeiTs) and object detection models (DETR). We find that adversarial patches occupying 0.5% of the input can lead to robust accuracies as low as 0% for ViT on ImageNet, and reduce the mAP of DETR on MS COCO to less than 3%.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems
Proposes 'Model Science' as a model-centric paradigm for AI with four pillars: verification, explanation, control, and interface.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.