Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ATST: Audio Representation Learning with Teacher-Student Transformer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.12076 v3 pith:Y2M42CF2 submitted 2022-04-26 eess.AS cs.AIcs.SD

ATST: Audio Representation Learning with Teacher-Student Transformer

classification eess.AS cs.AIcs.SD
keywords teacher-studenttransformeratstaudiocapabilitydataknowledgelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning (SSL) learns knowledge from a large amount of unlabeled data, and then transfers the knowledge to a specific problem with a limited number of labeled data. SSL has achieved promising results in various domains. This work addresses the problem of segment-level general audio SSL, and proposes a new transformer-based teacher-student SSL model, named ATST. A transformer encoder is developed on a recently emerged teacher-student baseline scheme, which largely improves the modeling capability of pre-training. In addition, a new strategy for positive pair creation is designed to fully leverage the capability of transformer. Extensive experiments have been conducted, and the proposed model achieves the new state-of-the-art results on almost all of the downstream tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting Audio-language Pretraining for Learning General-purpose Audio Representation

    eess.AS 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 10.7M-pair audio-caption corpus and systematic comparison show contrastive pretraining is more data-efficient while captioning scales better, and supervised initialization yields diminishing returns.