Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The NT-Xent loss upper bound

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.03169 v1 pith:CRUUFIMM submitted 2022-05-06 cs.LG

The NT-Xent loss upper bound

classification cs.LG
keywords losslearningboundnt-xentproposesrepresentationsimilarityupper
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Self-supervised learning is a growing paradigm in deep representation learning, showing great generalization capabilities and competitive performance in low-labeled data regimes. The SimCLR framework proposes the NT-Xent loss for contrastive representation learning. The objective of the loss function is to maximize agreement, similarity, between sampled positive pairs. This short paper derives and proposes an upper bound for the loss and average similarity. An analysis of the implications is however not provided, but we strongly encourage anyone in the field to conduct this.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DS@GT ARC at ImageCLEFmed GANs 2026: Geometric Filtering for Privacy-Preserving CT Slice Generation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Geometric filtering of synthetic CT slices reduces nearest-neighbor and membership-inference leakage, but patient re-identification leakage remains near 0.97–1.0 across all submissions.