Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

One-Pixel Shortcut: on the Learning Preference of Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12141 v2 pith:DRENIBMP submitted 2022-05-24 cs.LG stat.ML

One-Pixel Shortcut: on the Learning Preference of Deep Neural Networks

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords trainingaccuracyadversarialimagesmodelonlytrainedaugmentations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Unlearnable examples (ULEs) aim to protect data from unauthorized usage for training DNNs. Existing work adds $\ell_\infty$-bounded perturbations to the original sample so that the trained model generalizes poorly. Such perturbations, however, are easy to eliminate by adversarial training and data augmentations. In this paper, we resolve this problem from a novel perspective by perturbing only one pixel in each image. Interestingly, such a small modification could effectively degrade model accuracy to almost an untrained counterpart. Moreover, our produced \emph{One-Pixel Shortcut (OPS)} could not be erased by adversarial training and strong augmentations. To generate OPS, we perturb in-class images at the same position to the same target value that could mostly and stably deviate from all the original images. Since such generation is only based on images, OPS needs significantly less computation cost than the previous methods using DNN generators. Based on OPS, we introduce an unlearnable dataset called CIFAR-10-S, which is indistinguishable from CIFAR-10 by humans but induces the trained model to extremely low accuracy. Even under adversarial training, a ResNet-18 trained on CIFAR-10-S has only 10.61% accuracy, compared to 83.02% by the existing error-minimizing method.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Far Are We from True Unlearnability?

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Current unlearnable examples fail under multi-task training, and the proposed SAL and UD metrics quantify how far each method is from true unlearnability.

  2. Nonlinear Transformations Against Unlearnable Datasets

    cs.LG 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Nonlinear transformations enable DNNs to achieve substantial test accuracy gains (0.34% to 249.59%) on unlearnable CIFAR10 datasets from twelve protection methods, outperforming a recent linear baseline.

  3. SoK: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status of Neural Tangent Generalization Attacks with Research Directions

    cs.LG 2026-05 accept novelty 3.0

    NTGA is the first clean-label generalization attack under black-box settings but is vulnerable to adversarial training and image transformations, with newer attacks outperforming it.