REVIEW 1 cited by
QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
QPack Scores: Quantitative performance metrics for application-oriented quantum computer benchmarking
read the original abstract
This paper presents the benchmark score definitions of QPack, an application-oriented cross-platform benchmarking suite for quantum computers and simulators, which makes use of scalable Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and Variational Quantum Eigensolver applications. Using a varied set of benchmark applications, an insight of how well a quantum computer or its simulator performs on a general NISQ-era application can be quantitatively made. This paper presents what quantum execution data can be collected and transformed into benchmark scores for application-oriented quantum benchmarking. Definitions are given for an overall benchmark score, as well as sub-scores based on runtime, accuracy, scalability and capacity performance. Using these scores, a comparison is made between various quantum computer simulators, running both locally and on vendors' remote cloud services. We also use the QPack benchmark to collect a small set of quantum execution data of the IBMQ Nairobi quantum processor. The goal of the QPack benchmark scores is to give a holistic insight into quantum performance and the ability to make easy and quick comparisons between different quantum computers
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Quantum Fidelity-per-Cost: A Metric for Evaluation of Quantum Computing Systems
Cost-aware ranking of cloud QPUs via QFC disagrees with fidelity-only ranking; billing model, not hardware, fixes how the score scales with shot count.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.