Revisiting Pretraining Objectives for Tabular Deep Learning
read the original abstract
Recent deep learning models for tabular data currently compete with the traditional ML models based on decision trees (GBDT). Unlike GBDT, deep models can additionally benefit from pretraining, which is a workhorse of DL for vision and NLP. For tabular problems, several pretraining methods were proposed, but it is not entirely clear if pretraining provides consistent noticeable improvements and what method should be used, since the methods are often not compared to each other or comparison is limited to the simplest MLP architectures. In this work, we aim to identify the best practices to pretrain tabular DL models that can be universally applied to different datasets and architectures. Among our findings, we show that using the object target labels during the pretraining stage is beneficial for the downstream performance and advocate several target-aware pretraining objectives. Overall, our experiments demonstrate that properly performed pretraining significantly increases the performance of tabular DL models, which often leads to their superiority over GBDTs.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When, Where, and How: Adaptive Binning for Tabular Self-Supervised Learning
Adaptive Binning improves tabular SSL by coupling feature discretization to training via representation-aware curriculum learning and a heterogeneity-aware objective, yielding gains on medical datasets without per-dat...
-
Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive
DPOP is a new loss function that prevents DPO from lowering preferred response likelihoods and outperforms standard DPO on diverse datasets, MT-Bench, and enables Smaug-72B to exceed 80% on the Open LLM Leaderboard.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.