REVIEW 1 cited by
Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends
read the original abstract
Unfair behaviors of Machine Learning (ML) software have garnered increasing attention and concern among software engineers. To tackle this issue, extensive research has been dedicated to conducting fairness testing of ML software, and this paper offers a comprehensive survey of existing studies in this field. We collect 100 papers and organize them based on the testing workflow (i.e., how to test) and testing components (i.e., what to test). Furthermore, we analyze the research focus, trends, and promising directions in the realm of fairness testing. We also identify widely-adopted datasets and open-source tools for fairness testing.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Generalised Exponentiated Gradient Approach to Enhance Fairness in Binary and Multi-class Classification Tasks
A generalized Exponentiated Gradient method trains binary and multi-class classifiers under multiple linear fairness constraints, achieving fairness gains up to 92% at an accuracy cost up to 14 points.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.