Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Intent Classification and Slot-Filling Datasets for Task-Oriented Dialog

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.13211 v1 pith:5MKATOLB submitted 2022-07-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dialogsystemsclassificationdatasetsintentslot-fillingtask-orientedmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Interest in dialog systems has grown substantially in the past decade. By extension, so too has interest in developing and improving intent classification and slot-filling models, which are two components that are commonly used in task-oriented dialog systems. Moreover, good evaluation benchmarks are important in helping to compare and analyze systems that incorporate such models. Unfortunately, much of the literature in the field is limited to analysis of relatively few benchmark datasets. In an effort to promote more robust analyses of task-oriented dialog systems, we have conducted a survey of publicly available datasets for the tasks of intent classification and slot-filling. We catalog the important characteristics of each dataset, and offer discussion on the applicability, strengths, and weaknesses of each. Our goal is that this survey aids in increasing the accessibility of these datasets, which we hope will enable their use in future evaluations of intent classification and slot-filling models for task-oriented dialog systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Selecting Open-Weight Language Models for Zero-Shot Intent Classification: A Systematic Evaluation of 41 Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across eight zero-shot intent datasets, instruction-tuned ~3B open-weight models can match or beat larger base models, top systems are statistically tied on MASSIVE, and SNIPS is saturated.

Pith tools