Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.04404 v1 pith:C3EHOS2U submitted 2022-08-08 cs.RO

POLAR: Preference Optimization and Learning Algorithms for Robotics

classification cs.RO
keywords learningpreferenceoperatorparametertoolboxpolarroboticalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Parameter tuning for robotic systems is a time-consuming and challenging task that often relies on domain expertise of the human operator. Moreover, existing learning methods are not well suited for parameter tuning for many reasons including: the absence of a clear numerical metric for `good robotic behavior'; limited data due to the reliance on real-world experimental data; and the large search space of parameter combinations. In this work, we present an open-source MATLAB Preference Optimization and Learning Algorithms for Robotics toolbox (POLAR) for systematically exploring high-dimensional parameter spaces using human-in-the-loop preference-based learning. This aim of this toolbox is to systematically and efficiently accomplish one of two objectives: 1) to optimize robotic behaviors for human operator preference; 2) to learn the operator's underlying preference landscape to better understand the relationship between adjustable parameters and operator preference. The POLAR toolbox achieves these objectives using only subjective feedback mechanisms (pairwise preferences, coactive feedback, and ordinal labels) to infer a Bayesian posterior over the underlying reward function dictating the user's preferences. We demonstrate the performance of the toolbox in simulation and present various applications of human-in-the-loop preference-based learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Local Preferential Bayesian Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Local PBO methods using trust-region and derivative-informed local search on Laplace-approximated GP posteriors reduce cumulative regret versus global baselines in high-dimensional benchmarks.