REVIEW 1 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
POLAR: Preference Optimization and Learning Algorithms for Robotics
read the original abstract
Parameter tuning for robotic systems is a time-consuming and challenging task that often relies on domain expertise of the human operator. Moreover, existing learning methods are not well suited for parameter tuning for many reasons including: the absence of a clear numerical metric for `good robotic behavior'; limited data due to the reliance on real-world experimental data; and the large search space of parameter combinations. In this work, we present an open-source MATLAB Preference Optimization and Learning Algorithms for Robotics toolbox (POLAR) for systematically exploring high-dimensional parameter spaces using human-in-the-loop preference-based learning. This aim of this toolbox is to systematically and efficiently accomplish one of two objectives: 1) to optimize robotic behaviors for human operator preference; 2) to learn the operator's underlying preference landscape to better understand the relationship between adjustable parameters and operator preference. The POLAR toolbox achieves these objectives using only subjective feedback mechanisms (pairwise preferences, coactive feedback, and ordinal labels) to infer a Bayesian posterior over the underlying reward function dictating the user's preferences. We demonstrate the performance of the toolbox in simulation and present various applications of human-in-the-loop preference-based learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Local Preferential Bayesian Optimization
Local PBO methods using trust-region and derivative-informed local search on Laplace-approximated GP posteriors reduce cumulative regret versus global baselines in high-dimensional benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.