Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Prediction Intervals and Confidence Regions for Symbolic Regression Models based on Likelihood Profiles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.06454 v1 pith:HWTO6WOL submitted 2022-09-14 cs.LG cs.NE

Prediction Intervals and Confidence Regions for Symbolic Regression Models based on Likelihood Profiles

classification cs.LG cs.NE
keywords regressionmodelslikelihoodprofilessymboliccalculationconfidencedecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Symbolic regression is a nonlinear regression method which is commonly performed by an evolutionary computation method such as genetic programming. Quantification of uncertainty of regression models is important for the interpretation of models and for decision making. The linear approximation and so-called likelihood profiles are well-known possibilities for the calculation of confidence and prediction intervals for nonlinear regression models. These simple and effective techniques have been completely ignored so far in the genetic programming literature. In this work we describe the calculation of likelihood profiles in details and also provide some illustrative examples with models created with three different symbolic regression algorithms on two different datasets. The examples highlight the importance of the likelihood profiles to understand the limitations of symbolic regression models and to help the user taking an informed post-prediction decision.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are you sure? A Comprehensive and Comprehensible Survey of Uncertainty Quantification in Symbolic Regression

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A survey claiming to be the first comprehensive review of uncertainty quantification in symbolic regression, organized into three research directions and noting the area remains underexplored.

  2. Exploring Multi-view Symbolic Regression methods in physical sciences

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    Benchmarking four multi-view symbolic regression packages on five real scientific datasets shows all find accurate compact models; parameter limits and shared constants emerge as key design features.