REVIEW 2 cited by
Clique Homology is QMA1-hard
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We tackle the long-standing question of the computational complexity of determining homology groups of simplicial complexes, a fundamental task in computational topology, posed by Kaibel and Pfetsch 20 years ago. We show that this decision problem is QMA1-hard. Moreover, we show that a version of the problem satisfying a suitable promise and certain constraints is contained in QMA. This suggests that the seemingly classical problem may in fact be quantum mechanical. In fact, we are able to significantly strengthen this by showing that the problem remains QMA1-hard in the case of clique complexes, a family of simplicial complexes specified by a graph which is relevant to the problem of topological data analysis. The proof combines a number of techniques from Hamiltonian complexity and homological algebra. We discuss potential implications for the problem of quantum advantage in topological data analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A quantum algorithm for Khovanov homology
A conditional quantum algorithm for estimating the Betti numbers of Khovanov homology, together with DQC1, BQP, and #P hardness results for harder approximation regimes.
-
Testing the presence of balanced and bipartite components in a sparse graph is QMA1-hard
The claimed QMA1-hardness of sparse balancedness and sparse bipartitedness is not established, because the main spectral equivalence is false.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.