Detecting Label Errors in Token Classification Data
read the original abstract
Mislabeled examples are a common issue in real-world data, particularly for tasks like token classification where many labels must be chosen on a fine-grained basis. Here we consider the task of finding sentences that contain label errors in token classification datasets. We study 11 different straightforward methods that score tokens/sentences based on the predicted class probabilities output by a (any) token classification model (trained via any procedure). In precision-recall evaluations based on real-world label errors in entity recognition data from CoNLL-2003, we identify a simple and effective method that consistently detects those sentences containing label errors when applied with different token classification models.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Revising RVL-CDIP: Quantifying Errors and Test-Train Overlap
RVL-CDIP contains 12% label errors and 35% train-test duplicates; correcting labels improves OOD generalization while deduplication reduces in-distribution accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.