Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.09472 v2 pith:BTZT63KR submitted 2022-10-17 cs.CL cs.IR

Multi-granularity Argument Mining in Legal Texts

classification cs.CL cs.IR
keywords argumentclassificationlegalminingtoken-levelmodelproblemtext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore legal argument mining using multiple levels of granularity. Argument mining has usually been conceptualized as a sentence classification problem. In this work, we conceptualize argument mining as a token-level (i.e., word-level) classification problem. We use a Longformer model to classify the tokens. Results show that token-level text classification identifies certain legal argument elements more accurately than sentence-level text classification. Token-level classification also provides greater flexibility to analyze legal texts and to gain more insight into what the model focuses on when processing a large amount of input data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Discourse-Aware Policy Analysis with Argumentation: A Hybrid LLM-Symbolic Framework for Disaster Governance

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A hybrid LLM-symbolic pipeline maps disaster-policy text to typed argumentation graphs using new frame-mediated relation subtypes, with a new 100-document dataset from USA, UK, Canada, and Australia.