Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Online Adaptive Policy Selection in Time-Varying Systems: No-Regret via Contractive Perturbations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.12320 v3 pith:G4TPGUBK submitted 2022-10-22 math.OC

Online Adaptive Policy Selection in Time-Varying Systems: No-Regret via Contractive Perturbations

classification math.OC
keywords policyonlineselectionadaptivealgorithmgapscontractiveconvexity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study online adaptive policy selection in systems with time-varying costs and dynamics. We develop the Gradient-based Adaptive Policy Selection (GAPS) algorithm together with a general analytical framework for online policy selection via online optimization. Under our proposed notion of contractive policy classes, we show that GAPS approximates the behavior of an ideal online gradient descent algorithm on the policy parameters while requiring less information and computation. When convexity holds, our algorithm is the first to achieve optimal policy regret. When convexity does not hold, we provide the first local regret bound for online policy selection. Our numerical experiments show that GAPS can adapt to changing environments more quickly than existing benchmarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Role Steering of Language Models for Social Simulations

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A role-steering screening workflow on 275 roles shows role-specific activation directions beat a non-scale-matched assistant-direction control (63.2 vs 41.1 judged alignment) and flags 38 roles as 'anti-controllable'.