Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14707 v3 pith:KXBRJD7O submitted 2022-10-26 cs.LG stat.ML

Is Out-of-Distribution Detection Learnable?

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords detectiondatasomeimpossibilitylearnabilityscenariosseveraltheorems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Supervised learning aims to train a classifier under the assumption that training and test data are from the same distribution. To ease the above assumption, researchers have studied a more realistic setting: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, where test data may come from classes that are unknown during training (i.e., OOD data). Due to the unavailability and diversity of OOD data, good generalization ability is crucial for effective OOD detection algorithms. To study the generalization of OOD detection, in this paper, we investigate the probably approximately correct (PAC) learning theory of OOD detection, which is proposed by researchers as an open problem. First, we find a necessary condition for the learnability of OOD detection. Then, using this condition, we prove several impossibility theorems for the learnability of OOD detection under some scenarios. Although the impossibility theorems are frustrating, we find that some conditions of these impossibility theorems may not hold in some practical scenarios. Based on this observation, we next give several necessary and sufficient conditions to characterize the learnability of OOD detection in some practical scenarios. Lastly, we also offer theoretical supports for several representative OOD detection works based on our OOD theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A deliberately narrow specialist can profitably keep a defect only when the detector that triggers compensation sits outside the defect; inside, the miss rate equals the capture rate.

  2. Self-Poisoning in Adaptive Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sharp-Threshold Theory and Certified Label-Free Calibration

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In adaptive OOD detection, bank impurity follows a mean-field urn law whose kernel slope acts as a reproduction number; a frozen-reserve gate removes the supercritical collapse, and a two-world theorem caps label-free...

  3. Removable Defects: The Economics and Limits of Deliberate Deficiency

    econ.EM 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A competence defect is profitably removable exactly when a detector outside the defect can separate fatal cases and an advantage condition holds, with premium equal to the ROC support function at economic prices.

  4. Robust AI Security and Alignment: A Sisyphean Endeavor?

    cs.AI 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI security and alignment cannot achieve full robustness because any sufficiently powerful AI inherits incompleteness-style limitations from formal systems.