REVIEW 1 cited by
DeepDC: Deep Distance Correlation as a Perceptual Image Quality Evaluator
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DeepDC: Deep Distance Correlation as a Perceptual Image Quality Evaluator
read the original abstract
ImageNet pre-trained deep neural networks (DNNs) show notable transferability for building effective image quality assessment (IQA) models. Such a remarkable byproduct has often been identified as an emergent property in previous studies. In this work, we attribute such capability to the intrinsic texture-sensitive characteristic that classifies images using texture features. We fully exploit this characteristic to develop a novel full-reference IQA (FR-IQA) model based exclusively on pre-trained DNN features. Specifically, we compute the distance correlation, a highly promising yet relatively under-investigated statistic, between reference and distorted images in the deep feature domain. In addition, the distance correlation quantifies both linear and nonlinear feature relationships, which is far beyond the widely used first-order and second-order statistics in the feature space. We conduct comprehensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed quality model on five standard IQA datasets, one perceptual similarity dataset, two texture similarity datasets, and one geometric transformation dataset. Moreover, we optimize the proposed model to generate a broad spectrum of texture patterns, by treating the model as the style loss function for neural style transfer (NST). Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed texture synthesis and NST methods achieve the best quantitative and qualitative results. We release our code at https://github.com/h4nwei/DeepDC.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation
A hybrid DSCS+PC light-field QA framework and public dataset show objective metrics drop when view-synthesis/3DGS distortions join coding artifacts, and view pooling affects agreement.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.