Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Data-pooling Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Healthcare Intervention

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.08998 v1 pith:SUNU5N2R submitted 2022-11-16 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords algorithmdatadata-poolinghealthcareinterventionperformancepersonalizedaggregate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivated by the emerging needs of personalized preventative intervention in many healthcare applications, we consider a multi-stage, dynamic decision-making problem in the online setting with unknown model parameters. To deal with the pervasive issue of small sample size in personalized planning, we develop a novel data-pooling reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm based on a general perturbed value iteration framework. Our algorithm adaptively pools historical data, with three main innovations: (i) the weight of pooling ties directly to the performance of decision (measured by regret) as opposed to estimation accuracy in conventional methods; (ii) no parametric assumptions are needed between historical and current data; and (iii) requiring data-sharing only via aggregate statistics, as opposed to patient-level data. Our data-pooling algorithm framework applies to a variety of popular RL algorithms, and we establish a theoretical performance guarantee showing that our pooling version achieves a regret bound strictly smaller than that of the no-pooling counterpart. We substantiate the theoretical development with empirically better performance of our algorithm via a case study in the context of post-discharge intervention to prevent unplanned readmissions, generating practical insights for healthcare management. In particular, our algorithm alleviates privacy concerns about sharing health data, which (i) opens the door for individual organizations to levering public datasets or published studies to better manage their own patients; and (ii) provides the basis for public policy makers to encourage organizations to share aggregate data to improve population health outcomes for the broader community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contextual Online Pricing with (Biased) Offline Data

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Contextual online pricing can safely incorporate biased offline data, achieving the standard square-root-of-T worst-case regret and better rates when the offline bias is small.

  2. Best Arm Identification with Possibly Biased Offline Data

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LUCB-H adaptively combines offline and online data for best arm identification, matching or beating standard LUCB depending on whether the historical data is helpful or misleading.

Pith tools