REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performance
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performance
read the original abstract
Plotting a learner's generalization performance against the training set size results in a so-called learning curve. This tool, providing insight in the behavior of the learner, is also practically valuable for model selection, predicting the effect of more training data, and reducing the computational complexity of training. We set out to make the (ideal) learning curve concept precise and briefly discuss the aforementioned usages of such curves. The larger part of this survey's focus, however, is on learning curves that show that more data does not necessarily leads to better generalization performance. A result that seems surprising to many researchers in the field of artificial intelligence. We point out the significance of these findings and conclude our survey with an overview and discussion of open problems in this area that warrant further theoretical and empirical investigation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Data-Efficient Deep Learning: Empirical Guidelines for Training Set Size Estimation in Inertial Sensor Classification
Classification accuracy on inertial HAR and SLR tasks follows a consistent logarithmic growth with training-set size, enabling a MAPD-based stability-point metric that often saturates far below traditional heuristics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.