REVIEW 6 cited by
Toward General Design Principles for Generative AI Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Generative AI technologies are growing in power, utility, and use. As generative technologies are being incorporated into mainstream applications, there is a need for guidance on how to design those applications to foster productive and safe use. Based on recent research on human-AI co-creation within the HCI and AI communities, we present a set of seven principles for the design of generative AI applications. These principles are grounded in an environment of generative variability. Six principles are focused on designing for characteristics of generative AI: multiple outcomes & imperfection; exploration & control; and mental models & explanations. In addition, we urge designers to design against potential harms that may be caused by a generative model's hazardous output, misuse, or potential for human displacement. We anticipate these principles to usefully inform design decisions made in the creation of novel human-AI applications, and we invite the community to apply, revise, and extend these principles to their own work.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
"Maybe We Need Some More Examples:" Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use
Frequent and infrequent GenAI tool users differ in how they perceive the tool, how they experiment, and how they respond to failure, and organizational support shapes these differences.
-
Understanding Design Fixation in Generative AI
Generative AI models exhibit a design fixation phenomenon that limits the diversity and originality of their design outputs, according to a small lab study and a proposed theoretical framework.
-
Comparing Socio-technical Design Principles with Guidelines for Human-centered AI
Comparing HCAI guidelines with socio-technical principles yields revised heuristics stressing continuous evolution, collaborative autonomy, and whole-system transparency for AI.
-
A Grey Literature Review of AI-Native Applications
A systematic grey literature review identifies the defining characteristics, quality attributes, and technology stacks of AI-native applications, and proposes a dual-layered engineering blueprint.
-
AI-Based Sound Effect Generation: A Narrative Review of Generative Models Across Input Modalities
A narrative review of 30 recent papers classifies AI sound-effect generators by input modality and summarizes reported progress and remaining limitations in temporal sync, evaluation, and controllability.
-
GenAI-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning towards Distributed Agent Intelligence: A Generative-RL Agent Perspective
A position paper claiming that generative-AI agents that model and predict multi-agent dynamics will replace today's reactive MARL approaches.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.