Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On a continuous time model of gradient descent dynamics and instability in deep learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.01952 v3 pith:CHVGWUP4 submitted 2023-02-03 stat.ML cs.LG

On a continuous time model of gradient descent dynamics and instability in deep learning

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords descentgradientlearningcontinuousdeepflowinstabilitybehind
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The recipe behind the success of deep learning has been the combination of neural networks and gradient-based optimization. Understanding the behavior of gradient descent however, and particularly its instability, has lagged behind its empirical success. To add to the theoretical tools available to study gradient descent we propose the principal flow (PF), a continuous time flow that approximates gradient descent dynamics. To our knowledge, the PF is the only continuous flow that captures the divergent and oscillatory behaviors of gradient descent, including escaping local minima and saddle points. Through its dependence on the eigendecomposition of the Hessian the PF sheds light on the recently observed edge of stability phenomena in deep learning. Using our new understanding of instability we propose a learning rate adaptation method which enables us to control the trade-off between training stability and test set evaluation performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do Deep Networks Forget Initialization? A Forgetting-Time View of Practical Inductive Bias

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Trained ResNets on CIFAR-10 retain measurable dependence on initialization scale under low-LR SGD (26.5 pp test accuracy spread) but not under Adam, indicating that practical inductive bias is shaped by the forgetting...

  2. Learning Gradient Flow: Using Equation Discovery to Accelerate Engineering Optimization

    math.OC 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    An optimizer that fits a SINDy polynomial model to recent optimization-variable trajectories and then integrates that surrogate flow instead of evaluating the true objective/gradient can cut gradient-evaluation counts...