REVIEW 1 cited by
SOCRATES: Text-based Human Search and Approach using a Robot Dog
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
SOCRATES: Text-based Human Search and Approach using a Robot Dog
read the original abstract
In this paper, we propose a SOCratic model for Robots Approaching humans based on TExt System (SOCRATES) focusing on the human search and approach based on free-form textual description; the robot first searches for the target user, then the robot proceeds to approach in a human-friendly manner. In particular, textual descriptions are composed of appearance (e.g., wearing white shirts with black hair) and location clues (e.g., is a student who works with robots). We initially present a Human Search Socratic Model that connects large pre-trained models in the language domain to solve the downstream task, which is searching for the target person based on textual descriptions. Then, we propose a hybrid learning-based framework for generating target-cordial robotic motion to approach a person, consisting of a learning-from-demonstration module and a knowledge distillation module. We validate the proposed searching module via simulation using a virtual mobile robot as well as through real-world experiments involving participants and the Boston Dynamics Spot robot. Furthermore, we analyze the properties of the proposed approaching framework with human participants based on the Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS)
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
UESF-Bench: Benchmarking and Probing for Unified Embodied Seeking and Following
UESF-Bench is a 1.43M-sample simulated benchmark for embodied agents that must first find a language-described person and then follow them; SeekFollow-VLA with task-driven routing outperforms the paper's internal baselines.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.