Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Frustratingly Simple but Effective Zero-shot Detection and Segmentation: Analysis and a Strong Baseline

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.07319 v1 pith:WSFTXTFP submitted 2023-02-14 cs.CV

Frustratingly Simple but Effective Zero-shot Detection and Segmentation: Analysis and a Strong Baseline

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionsegmentationobjectzero-shotdesigneffectivemethodarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Methods for object detection and segmentation often require abundant instance-level annotations for training, which are time-consuming and expensive to collect. To address this, the task of zero-shot object detection (or segmentation) aims at learning effective methods for identifying and localizing object instances for the categories that have no supervision available. Constructing architectures for these tasks requires choosing from a myriad of design options, ranging from the form of the class encoding used to transfer information from seen to unseen categories, to the nature of the function being optimized for learning. In this work, we extensively study these design choices, and carefully construct a simple yet extremely effective zero-shot recognition method. Through extensive experiments on the MSCOCO dataset on object detection and segmentation, we highlight that our proposed method outperforms existing, considerably more complex, architectures. Our findings and method, which we propose as a competitive future baseline, point towards the need to revisit some of the recent design trends in zero-shot detection / segmentation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Promptable Concept Segmentation from Above: Evaluating SAM 3's Zero-Shot and One-Shot Capabilities in Remote Sensing

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Visual prompts align SAM 3 to remote-sensing geometry while textual prompts inject ground-level bias that degrades detection; a training-free proxy shows strong segmentation Harmonic Mean but persistent small-object a...