REVIEW 1 cited by
Differentially Private Continual Release of Histograms and Related Queries
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Differentially Private Continual Release of Histograms and Related Queries
read the original abstract
We study privately releasing column sums of a $d$-dimensional table with entries from a universe $\chi$ undergoing $T$ row updates, called histogram under continual release. Our mechanisms give better additive $\ell_\infty$-error than existing mechanisms for a large class of queries and input streams. Our first contribution is an output-sensitive mechanism in the insertions-only model ($\chi = \{0,1\}$) for maintaining (i) the histogram or (ii) queries that do not require maintaining the entire histogram, such as the maximum or minimum column sum, the median, or any quantiles. The mechanism has an additive error of $O(d\log^2 (dq^*)+\log T)$ whp, where $q^*$ is the maximum output value over all time steps on this dataset. The mechanism does not require $q^*$ as input. This breaks the $\Omega(d \log T)$ bound of prior work when $q^* \ll T$. Our second contribution is a mechanism for the turnstile model that admits negative entry updates ($\chi = \{-1, 0,1\}$). This mechanism has an additive error of $O(d \log^2 (dK) + \log T)$ whp, where $K$ is the number of times two consecutive data rows differ, and the mechanism does not require $K$ as input. This is useful when monitoring inputs that only vary under unusual circumstances. For $d=1$ this gives the first private mechanism with error $O(\log^2 K + \log T)$ for continual counting in the turnstile model, improving on the $O(\log^2 n + \log T)$ error bound by Dwork et al. [ASIACRYPT 2015], where $n$ is the number of ones in the stream, as well as allowing negative entries, while Dwork et al. [ASIACRYPT 2015] can only handle nonnegative entries ($\chi=\{0,1\}$).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation
Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.