Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.12691 v1 pith:24QXD3GW submitted 2023-02-24 cs.AI

Reproducibility of Machine Learning: Terminology, Recommendations and Open Issues

classification cs.AI
keywords reproducibilityartificialintelligenceissueslearningmachinerecommendationscore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Reproducibility is one of the core dimensions that concur to deliver Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Broadly speaking, reproducibility can be defined as the possibility to reproduce the same or a similar experiment or method, thereby obtaining the same or similar results as the original scientists. It is an essential ingredient of the scientific method and crucial for gaining trust in relevant claims. A reproducibility crisis has been recently acknowledged by scientists and this seems to affect even more Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, due to the complexity of the models at the core of their recent successes. Notwithstanding the recent debate on Artificial Intelligence reproducibility, its practical implementation is still insufficient, also because many technical issues are overlooked. In this survey, we critically review the current literature on the topic and highlight the open issues. Our contribution is three-fold. We propose a concise terminological review of the terms coming into play. We collect and systematize existing recommendations for achieving reproducibility, putting forth the means to comply with them. We identify key elements often overlooked in modern Machine Learning and provide novel recommendations for them. We further specialize these for two critical application domains, namely the biomedical and physical artificial intelligence fields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Private, Verifiable, and Auditable AI Systems

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    A thesis demonstrating partial prototypes for zk-verifiable model evaluation and privacy-preserving retrieval, and arguing these pieces can compose into end-to-end auditable AI systems.