Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing of the Means of Correlated Normals Against Two-Sided Alternatives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.05261 v1 pith:HFBBRZNF submitted 2023-04-11 math.ST stat.TH

On Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing of the Means of Correlated Normals Against Two-Sided Alternatives

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords matrixquestionalternativesanswercovariancediscoveryfalsefollowing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper revisits the following open question in simultaneous testing of multivariate normal means against two-sided alternatives: Can the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (BH, 1995) control the false discovery rate (FDR) without imposing any dependence structure on the correlations? The answer to this question is generally believed to be yes, and is conjectured so in the literature since results of numerical studies investigating the question and reported in numerous papers strongly support it. No theoretical justification of this answer has yet been put forward in the literature, as far as we know. In this paper, we offer a partial proof of this conjecture. More specifically, we consider the following two settings - (i) the covariance matrix is known and (ii) the covariance matrix is an unknown scalar multiple of a known matrix - and prove that in each of these settings a BH-type stepup method based on some weighted versions of the original z- or t-test statistics controls the FDR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much Can Gaussian Dependence Inflate the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure's FDR?

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    No universal multiplicative FDR bound holds for Benjamini-Hochberg under Gaussian dependence: worst-case FDR/q diverges like sqrt(log(1/q)), with exact constants in natural cases.