REVIEW 1 cited by
On Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing of the Means of Correlated Normals Against Two-Sided Alternatives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing of the Means of Correlated Normals Against Two-Sided Alternatives
read the original abstract
This paper revisits the following open question in simultaneous testing of multivariate normal means against two-sided alternatives: Can the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (BH, 1995) control the false discovery rate (FDR) without imposing any dependence structure on the correlations? The answer to this question is generally believed to be yes, and is conjectured so in the literature since results of numerical studies investigating the question and reported in numerous papers strongly support it. No theoretical justification of this answer has yet been put forward in the literature, as far as we know. In this paper, we offer a partial proof of this conjecture. More specifically, we consider the following two settings - (i) the covariance matrix is known and (ii) the covariance matrix is an unknown scalar multiple of a known matrix - and prove that in each of these settings a BH-type stepup method based on some weighted versions of the original z- or t-test statistics controls the FDR.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
How Much Can Gaussian Dependence Inflate the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure's FDR?
No universal multiplicative FDR bound holds for Benjamini-Hochberg under Gaussian dependence: worst-case FDR/q diverges like sqrt(log(1/q)), with exact constants in natural cases.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.