REVIEW 1 cited by
Modular flavour symmetry and orbifolds
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Modular flavour symmetry and orbifolds
read the original abstract
We develop a bottom-up approach to flavour models which combine modular symmetry with orbifold constructions. We first consider a 6d orbifold $\mathbb{T}^2/\mathbb{Z}_N$, with a single torus defined by one complex coordinate $z$ and a single modulus field $\tau$, playing the role of a flavon transforming under a finite modular symmetry. We then consider 10d orbifolds with three factorizable tori, each defined by one complex coordinate $z_i$ and involving the three moduli fields $\tau_1, \tau_2, \tau_3$ transforming under three finite modular groups. Assuming supersymmetry, consistent with the holomorphicity requirement, we consider all 10d orbifolds of the form $(\mathbb{T}^2)^3/(\mathbb{Z}_N\times\mathbb{Z}_M)$, and list those which have fixed values of the moduli fields (up to an integer). The key advantage of such 10d orbifold models over 4d models is that the values of the moduli are not completely free but are constrained by geometry and symmetry. To illustrate the approach we discuss a 10d modular seesaw model with $S_4^3$ modular symmetry based on $(\mathbb{T}^2)^3/(\mathbb{Z}_4\times\mathbb{Z}_2)$ where $\tau_1=i,\ \tau_2=i+2$ are constrained by the orbifold, while $\tau_3=\omega$ is determined by imposing a further remnant $S_4$ flavour symmetry, leading to a highly predictive example in the class CSD$(n)$ with $n=1-\sqrt{6}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Lepton mixing from the $\Delta(96)$ Modular Littlest Seesaw
An exhaustive scan of Δ(96) Modular Littlest Seesaw models yields 35 viable residual-symmetry patterns with new fixed PMNS columns and sharp, testable predictions beyond TM1.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.