REVIEW 1 cited by
Sparsified Model Zoo Twins: Investigating Populations of Sparsified Neural Network Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Sparsified Model Zoo Twins: Investigating Populations of Sparsified Neural Network Models
read the original abstract
With growing size of Neural Networks (NNs), model sparsification to reduce the computational cost and memory demand for model inference has become of vital interest for both research and production. While many sparsification methods have been proposed and successfully applied on individual models, to the best of our knowledge their behavior and robustness has not yet been studied on large populations of models. With this paper, we address that gap by applying two popular sparsification methods on populations of models (so called model zoos) to create sparsified versions of the original zoos. We investigate the performance of these two methods for each zoo, compare sparsification layer-wise, and analyse agreement between original and sparsified populations. We find both methods to be very robust with magnitude pruning able outperform variational dropout with the exception of high sparsification ratios above 80%. Further, we find sparsified models agree to a high degree with their original non-sparsified counterpart, and that the performance of original and sparsified model is highly correlated. Finally, all models of the model zoos and their sparsified model twins are publicly available: modelzoos.cc.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Expressive Power of Permutation-Equivariant Weight-Space Networks
Permutation-equivariant weight-space networks are all equally expressive, and universality holds when hidden-layer biases are pairwise distinct.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.